It appears you have not yet registered with the DOG Forums. To register please click here...

Dog  

Go Back   Dog Forums > General Dog Stuff > Dog Chat
Register
Dog Forum Dog Pictures Dogs for Sale Register Top Posters FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Dog Forums Read

Notices

Featured Photos
I Love my Yorkies
Moss
Me and my GF
Baguera

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2008   #1 (permalink)
Member
Puppy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
Posts: 53
Kris L. Christine is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Canine Rabies Vaccine Studies Begin!!

CANINE RABIES VACCINE CHALLENGE STUDIES BEGIN !

One of the most important vaccine research studies in veterinary medicine is underway at the University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine in Madison. Dr. Ronald Schultz, a leading authority on veterinary vaccines and Chair of the Department of Pathobiological Sciences, has begun concurrent 5 and 7 year challenge studies to determine the long-term duration of immunity of the canine rabies vaccine, with the goal of extending the state-mandated interval for boosters. These will be the first long-term challenge studies on the canine rabies vaccine to be published in the United States.

Dr. Schultz comments that: "We are all very excited to start this study that will hopefully demonstrate that rabies vaccines can provide a minimum of 7 years of immunity."

This research is being financed by The Rabies Challenge Fund, a charitable trust founded by pet vaccine disclosure advocate Kris L. Christine of Maine, who serves as Co-Trustee with world-renowned veterinary research scientist and practicing clinician, Dr. W. Jean Dodds of Hemopet in California. The Rabies Challenge Fund recently met its goal of $177,000 to fund the studies’ first year budget with contributions from dog owners, canine groups, trainers, veterinarians, and small businesses. Annual budget goals of $150,000 for the studies must be met in the future.

Dr. Jean Dodds, DVM states: "This is the first time in my 43 years of involvement in veterinary issues that what started as a grass-roots effort to change an outmoded regulation affecting animals will be addressed scientifically by an acknowledged expert to benefit all canines in the future."

Scientific data published in 1992 by Michel Aubert and his research team demonstrated that dogs were immune to a rabies challenge 5 years after vaccination, while Dr. Schultz’s serological studies documented antibody titer counts at levels known to confer immunity to rabies 7 years post-vaccination. This data strongly suggests that state laws requiring annual or triennial rabies boosters for dogs are redundant. Because the rabies vaccine is the most potent of the veterinary vaccines and associated with significant adverse reactions, it should not be given more often than is necessary to maintain immunity. Adverse reactions such autoimmune diseases affecting the thyroid, joints, blood, eyes, skin, kidney, liver, bowel and central nervous system; anaphylactic shock; aggression; seizures; epilepsy; and fibrosarcomas at injection sites are linked to rabies vaccinations.

Study co-trustee Kris Christine adds: Because the USDA does not require vaccine manufacturers to provide long-term duration of immunity studies documenting maximum effectiveness when licensing their products, concerned dog owners have contributed the money to fund this research themselves. We want to ensure that rabies immunization laws are based upon independent, long-term scientific data.”

More information and regular updates on The Rabies Challenge Fund and the concurrent 5 and 7 year challenge studies it is financing can be found at the fund’s website designed by volunteer Andrea Brin at: funds raised to date.

PERMISSION GRANTED TO POST AND CROSS-POST THIS MESSAGE If you wish to be added to my e-mail list for updates on the Rabies Challenge Fund, please contact me at ledgespring@lincoln.midcoast.com .

If anyone would like copies of the American Animal Hospital Association's Canine Vaccine Guidelines, the 1992 French challenge study demonstrating that dogs were immune to a rabies challenge 5 years after vaccination, the 2003 Italian study documenting fibrosarcomas at the presumed injection sites of rabies vaccines in dogs, as well as Dr. W. Jean Dodds' papers on vaccinal adverse reactions, please e-mail me at ledgespring@lincoln.midcoast.com.

Duration of Immunity to Canine Vaccines: What We Know and Don't Know, Dr. Ronald Schultz Duration of Immunity

World Small Animal Veterinary Association 2007 Vaccine Guidelines - WSAVA - Scientific Advisory Committee Scroll down to Vaccine Guidelines 2007 (PDF)

The 2003 American Animal Hospital Association's Canine Vaccine Guidelines are accessible online at Special Report .

The 2006 American Animal Hospital Association's Canine Vaccine Guidelines are downloadable in PDF format at About AAHA .

Veterinarian, Dr. Robert Rogers,has an excellent presentation on veterinary vaccines at Home

Last edited by Kris L. Christine; 03-18-2008 at 08:31 AM. Reason: added WSAVA link
Kris L. Christine is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Dog Links
Old 05-21-2008   #2 (permalink)
Junior Member
Newborn
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
samanthadozier is on a distinguished road
Default

HelpingAnimals.com // KP'S DOG BLOG // When the Ends Don't Justify the Means
This is really outrageous. As many of you know, I despise the fact that rabies vaccinations are required for dogs every three years and even annually in some states. I've read about all the adverse reactions and the belief of many holistic vets that rabies vaccinations confer immunity for a lifetime. Nobody would like to see the laws changed to allow dogs to be vaccinated for rabies less frequently more than I would. However, I draw the line at torturing animals in order to accomplish that.
Apparently, some people have no such scruples, such as two people whom I admired and respected up until recently, when I read the "Rabies Challenge Fund Charitable Trust Research Study" for which one of them is fundraising and the other is the principal investigator. In this study, two rather large groups of beagles (each with at least 35 members―it's not known exactly how many) will be isolated for five years or seven years, depending on the group; at least 25 of them will be vaccinated; and then they will all be injected with rabies virus to see who dies and who doesn't. The man doing the experiment is Ronald Schultz, D.V.M., chair of pathobiology at the University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine and an outspoken critic of the laws regarding rabies vaccinations, and the person raising the funds for the experiment is none other than W. Jean Dodds, D.V.M., a veteran of the holistic veterinary medical community. I find this terribly disturbing and hypocritical.

Death by rabies is ugly indeed. The virus infects the brain, causing encephalitis, and can also attack the spinal cord. There can be everything from fever and flu-like symptoms to anxiety, confusion, erratic behavior, aggression, disorientation, seizures, partial paralysis, coma, and death from respiratory arrest. One of the horrible aspects of the disease is that the jaw and throat become paralyzed, making it impossible to drink or even swallow one's own saliva, causing the characteristic drooling.
Of course, none of this is mentioned in Dodds' fundraising. I doubt that she would get a dime if it were. She is soliciting funds from dog lovers of all kinds, preying on their fears for their own dogs' health while totally misleading them. Her Web site and her flier contain not a single word about the negative aspects and gruesome details of the actual experiment. This is deceitful at best. The idea of torturing upwards of 70 dogs in order to improve the health of the rest of the dog population is no different from deciding to torture 70 children in order to improve the health of other children. Those 70 dogs matter! Each one matters! None of them wants to die a horrible death, be killed prematurely, or spend their entire life in a kennel.

We all want our own dogs to be healthy, but people with true compassion don't want that to be at the expense of any other dogs. I'm sorry to have to say it, but in this experiment, the ends, as laudable as they are, do not justify the means.
A better way to spend the $1.25 million being raised for these experiments would be to develop an acceptable serological method to test for rabies antibodies and immunity to the rabies virus.

Last edited by samanthadozier; 05-22-2008 at 01:48 PM.
samanthadozier is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008   #3 (permalink)
Member
Puppy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
Posts: 53
Kris L. Christine is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Response to PETA member Samantha Dozier

Ms. Dozier and other PETA members have been targeting The Rabies Challenge Fund for about a week. Attacking The Rabies Challenge Fund, which seeks to save thousands of dogs' lives by funding the research with the goal of extending state-mandated rabies vaccine boosters to 5 and then 7 years will not change USDA vaccine licensing standards (which all 13 licensed rabies vaccines for dogs have gone through -- Fort Dodge, Merial, Schering-Plough, Intervet).

If PETA were truly concerned about dogs' lives, they would channel their concerns constructively and launch a massive petition to the USDA to get them to change their vaccine-licensing standards. Every member of The Rabies Challenge Fund team would applaud such a movement.

Dog owners who would like to see PETA petition the USDA to change their Code of Federal Requirements , Title 9, part 113.209 , please contact PETA's policy advisor, Samantha Dozier at samanthapeta@hotmail.com 757-622-7382 and let her know how you feel.

Below is a copy of Dr. Dodds' response to two other PETA members who have contacted her with concerns.

Unfortunately, this information from PETA is terribly misleading. See below. We've tried to have a dialog with PETA about their RCF concerns and so hope that they now understand what we're doing and why. We appreciate your concern about the way in which we must conduct the RCF Research Study. Please allow me to explain the regulatory requirements we must follow as specified by the Code of Federal Requirements, USDA , Title 9, part 113.209. We cannot get a new rabies vaccine licensed by the government with the extended booster periods of 5 and eventually 7 years unless we strictly follow these regulatory requirements. The protocol is not up to us .

The Rabies Challenge Fund is designed to prove to UDSA authorities that dogs only need two booster rabies vaccines in their lifetime. This would significantly reduce the tragedies outlined below, save countless animal pain and suffering, and still protect the public health.

The public has little understanding of how all vaccines must be tested through USDA -specified trials before they are licensed for veterinary use. Every currently licensed rabies vaccine has been required to successfully complete these specified trials; and these vaccines as you know are required by law.

Only purebred beagles raised in a dog breeding facility run by veterinarians are involved in our project. This a large USDA licensed facility maintained in strict compliance with animal care and use requirements. The dogs live in large pens and are housed together in small groups for socialization and exercise. Further socialization is provided by their caretakers.

Today, we have a formidable uphill battle compounded by inertia in trying to change outdated rabies regulations to reflect what is truly needed to protect animals and people from contracting rabies. The federal government is just not interested in promoting a uniform requirement throughout the country that rabies booster vaccinations be given every three years. A few individual states and locales still insist on mandating annual rabies boosters when these vaccines are licensed for three years by the USDA. The recent media furor over the annual rabies booster mandate by the city of Wichita, KS is but one example.

While this travesty continues under the rubrick of state's rights, countless companion animals suffer from being required to receive rabies boosters even when they're terminally ill, debilitated, very old or have a record of prior serious adverse reaction to vaccination. This usually occurs when veterinarians either don't believe that adverse events occur or are likely, or they use the excuse that they're merely following the law. This situation is further complicated when local or state authorities will not accept waivers of booster requirement even with a veterinary letter of justification and/or a rabies antibody titer beyond the 1:5 titer level deemed by CDC to be adequate for people. Just today, a distraught caregiver was faced with having to revaccinate a middle aged dog with prior history of collapse after rabies vaccine. The dog's rabies antibody titer was 1: 3125, six hundred times that required for people, and yet the local authorities refused to grant a waiver.

These all too common occurrences have resulted in an increasing number of people simply breaking the law and not vaccinating their dogs at all. However, IF these dogs injure someone, even accidentally, and they're quarantined without evidence of an in-date rabies vaccination, the public health authorities have the right to require surety and direct that the animal be killed; his/her head is then examined for rabies. One such tragedy where a family was not given the chance to appeal on behalf of their dog is in litigation as we speak.

Then, there are the heartbreaking adverse reactions and deaths that occur when animals are forced to be given rabies boosters in lieu of waivers, when justified, and the dog seizures uncontrollably and dies in the caregiver's arms. Such a case also happened this past week.

Best wishes. With reverence for all life. Jean

More information on this subject from Dr. Dodds below responding to another PETA Member's inquiry. None of the research dogs will be allowed to develop full-blown rabies (see below) and the vaccinates will survive.

1. Question: How many dogs actually suffer, per year, to make purposely killing 70 pure bread beagles acceptable?

Dr. Dodds' Reply: It has been estimated that the adverse reaction rate of aerious nature to rabies vaccinations is in the order of 0.38- 0. 50 % , with another 1-3% of vacinates experiencing less severe reactions. of the millions of dogs thatr must be vacinated by law annually.

2. Question: How long does the dog suffer with obvious rabies before he is humanely euthanized?

Dr. Dodds' Reply: Not at all ; as soon as any relevant sign is noted with round-the-clock coiverage --- at the end of the 5 and 7 year trials -- when all the dogs must be challenged with rabies virus, they are humanely sacrificed. We expect that all the non-vaccinated dogs will become ill, and that vaccinates will survive. BUT, as all these dogs will be just housed in large family style group pens, cared for and socialized for the entire trial period, without any exposure challenge to rabies virus until the end of the study, we have at least 4 years of their routine husbandry and care in which to dialog with the respoonsible USDA authorities to ask them to consider an alternative endpoint to the trial -- for example, allowing us to run rabies vaccine serolgy titers as proff of adequartete protection from rabies rather than an actual live rabies virus challenge. Dr. Schultz and I are both personally committed to work towards changing the current requirements before the end of the trials.

3. Question: What makes you believe that if an owner does not vaccinate their dog every three years because of the reaction the dog may have to the vaccination, that that same owner WILL get the dog vaccinated every five years?

Dr. Dodds' Reply: We don't, but, if the law is changed , then a dog will only need one more booster in midlife and none in old age - a biger isue if they're frail or ill. Also, remember that some states and locales within states still madate annual rabies boosters ! In Wichita, KS and Cheyenne, WY a huge recent blitz of officials challenging their ignorant position of annual rabies vaccination resulted in the city ordinances being changed for the future. Much of this effort was spearheaded by Kris Christine and the RCF. .

Question: As we all know, there’s a fine line between scientific experiments that are worthwhile for the benefits of those in the future and there are those experiments that are more harmful than what will benefit anyone in the long run! I am a firm believer that the end must justify the means and I, at this point, am not convinced that the ends of this experiment justifies the means, mainly due to the fact that I’m unsure as to how many animals, per year, truly suffer from five vaccinations in their lifetimes, rather than just three !

Dr. Dodds' Answer: Rabies vaccine is the strongest of all vaccines available today, and so elicits the highest likelihood of adverse events , including death. I deal with these tragedies almost every day from all over North America -- as does Dr. Schultz.

Actually, this is what does and will happen -- once a rabies vaccine is licensed for 5 years, a puppy would receive 2 initial doses, and then one more dose 5 years after the second one. IF we can show that a rabies vaccine can be effective and licensed for 7 years, then the dog will require one more vaccine 7 years after the second one. As it now stands, dogs are required to get a rabies booster either annually or every three years after the second one -- depending on the applicable state or local laws, and so when these privately cared for dogs become older and ill or frail - even with life-threatening diseases, most states and locales refuse to grant exemptions from rabies boosters even with justification provided by the primary care veterinarian and/or a high level of rabies antibody titer.
__________________
Kris L. Christine
Founder, Co-Trustee
THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND

Last edited by Kris L. Christine; 07-12-2008 at 09:34 AM. Reason: corrected PETA contact
Kris L. Christine is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008   #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
Newborn
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
I hate PuppyMills is on a distinguished road
Default

Poor Beagles are used in many horendous experiments.
The Huntington Lab in England does the most cruel experiments.I saw a undercover documentary on it and it was heartbreaking.
Just as us Humans have immunity once we recieve Baby vaccines and don't get them over and over and over again.
Dogs too,have such immunity and don't need annual vaccines,they are set for life.
Why is it necesary to use Beagles.
If this experimant has to be done and it is known that the results will be accepted,will they? and why can't dogs that are going to be euthenized,be used(Poor Dogs)
Is it possible these dogs will survive?
If so they should surely escape euthenasia for going through this rotten experiment.
I am just wondering how this person saw your anti experiement post on here.
The whole thing just makes me cringe.
Also if these dogs do contract Rabies,will they be quickly put out of their misery.
Lots of ethical questions.
Once again,poor animals,such a test would never be done on Humans.

Last edited by I hate PuppyMills; 05-21-2008 at 11:01 PM.
I hate PuppyMills is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
Newborn
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
samanthadozier is on a distinguished road
Default

It's interesting that the Rabies Challenge Fund folks are now saying they will attempt to make changes to the protocol after the experiments have begun on beagles (even though it is highly unlikely the USDA will agree to that since the experiments have already begun). So it is still likely that many dogs will die and many will die excruciating deaths.

As far as I can tell, RCF has made no attempts to date to get a serological protocol approved. The experiments being conducted by RCF are purely elective. Why not design a tenable serological protocol that can be approved by USDA? A serological method would allow data to be collected from volunteers rather than dogs stuck in a laboratory. Why were none of these efforts made before PETA began to shine a spotlight on the myriad of problems with RCF's plans?

With regards to RCF's statement that PETA should be working on this issue, we are indeed working on non-animal protocols for vaccine testing at both the USDA and the FDA. PETA has spent more than a quarter million dollars in recent years to develop non-animal testing methods. We're very happy to put our money where our mouth is!

Despite repeated requests, the RCF folks have refused to provide details including:

. the actual number of dogs involved in each study. The USDA gives only the minimum number of dogs that they must have data for at the culmination of the study, so logically RCF must use more dogs than the USDA's minimum of 70. However, RCF will not even answer this simple question.

. the conditions and socialization for the dogs. Dodds referred PETA to USDA's protocol for this information. USDA's protocol does not specify that dogs should be socialized or that they should receive toys or even a bed.

. how and when the dogs would be killed. RCF referred PETA to the USDA protocol for this information. USDA's protocol stipulates that even vaccinated dogs are to be killed and their brains examined. This is in direct contradiction RCF's current claim that it will adopt out the dogs who don't die.

RCF makes it appear that dogs will be killed at the first signs of rabies. Rabies is painful and its symptoms can begin quietly. Dogs will likely die of painful complications related to paralysis and inability to breathe.

No one is disputing how the immune system works and that dogs are most likely being over-vaccinated in many ways. However, a way to combat this is not to launch yet another study that will kill even more dogs.

Much more good could have come from an effort to change the way rabies vaccine efficacy is tested rather than to use more than $1 million to kill beagles.

We encourage the RCF to do better! They could not be doing much worse.
samanthadozier is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #6 (permalink)
Junior Member
Newborn
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
I hate PuppyMills is on a distinguished road
Default

I saw a TV doucmentary once,where they blow torched a Pig,it was said it was to enhanch burn treatment.I am the medical field and the types of burns and how they heal,is is long been known.
The test of Rabbits where they suture their eyes shut and put in caustic materials has finally ended after thousand of innocent rabbits,sufferd terrible pain.
I have read of other such tets where the resuts were already known.
It seems drug compaines.some organizations etc. must prove they are worth something.A money raiser!
It seems the Rabies testing results haven't got any type of known approval and these poor dogs are going to have to indure a miserabe painful death.
I have to think any dog living under such stressful conditons,would have a strike against their immunity.
I just think these people are out to get themselves some highly publicised attention but it is negative to be sure.
Find another way please for the sake of the Dogs you are putting a death warrant on.
I hate PuppyMills is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #7 (permalink)
Member
Puppy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
Posts: 53
Kris L. Christine is on a distinguished road
Exclamation PETA and EUTHANASIA--4/28/08 Newsweek Article

PETA member, Samantha Dozier, failed to disclose the following in her post.

April 28, 2008 Newsweek article entitled PETA and Euthanasia by Jeneen Interlandi PETA and Euthanasia | Newsweek Newsweek: Management | Newsweek.com

"Since 1998 PETA has killed more than 17,000 animals, nearly 85 percent of all those it has rescued."
__________________
Kris L. Christine
Founder, Co-Trustee
THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
Kris L. Christine is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #8 (permalink)
Member
Puppy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
Posts: 53
Kris L. Christine is on a distinguished road
Exclamation PETA--Over 90% Put to Death, Channel 4 News Story

From Channel 3 News in Kentucky May 7, 2008: PETA killed 'companion animals' | KY3 | Trends

OVER 90 PERCENT PUT TO DEATH

"WASHINGTON -- An official report filed by People for The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) with the Virginia government shows that the organization put to death more than 90 percent of the dogs, cats, and other pets it took in for adoption during 2007. "
__________________
Kris L. Christine
Founder, Co-Trustee
THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
Kris L. Christine is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #9 (permalink)
Junior Member
Newborn
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
I hate PuppyMills is on a distinguished road
Default

Plese don't deflect from the question and the points made here.
This is my opinion,I am not a PETA person,in fact while they have educated people to animal crulety,including the farming industry,which has made me a vegetarian,I don't agree with their crazy beliefs.They have turned show dogs out onto highways,they don't believe animals should be pets,seeing eye dogs ect. and have euthenized them.In fact they wold rather see all animals be stamped out than held by Humans.They are off base,if you ask me and much,if not most has to do with the money they get.Only a fraction of it is spent on animals and I have never read about an animal shelter.A quarter million dollars they are bragging about spending in a post I read,it nothing compared to the money they haul in.
I dislike PETA with a passion.They are a cult in my opinion.
Please stick to the subject.Just like a Politicain,they always try to steer away from the point,when they are afraid of the truth.
I am writing about this Rabies Challenge and you know it.You certainly are protesting too much,a sure sign of a guilty conscience!!!!!!

Last edited by I hate PuppyMills; 05-23-2008 at 10:46 AM.
I hate PuppyMills is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #10 (permalink)
Member
Puppy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
Posts: 53
Kris L. Christine is on a distinguished road
Exclamation

Guilty Conscience? For what precisely?

The Rabies Challenge Fund has never tried to hide the fact that we are financing challenge studies -- if you look at our title, website, press releases, the word challenge is everywhere.

We are funding research that could save the lives of thousands of dogs, it is not our protocol, but rather the USDA's, that requires euthanization of the study animals -- it would be wonderful if PETA would initiate an effort to change them.

My point in posting the 2 PETA stories above is to show PETA'S incredible hypocrisy for euthanizing thousands of animals they took in for adoption (for what purpose?) and then pointing the finger at The Rabies Challenge Fund for financing research in which the USDA mandates euthanization of 40 animals. Because USDA regulations require it, in 5 years (if PETA does not take action to change Title 9, part 113.209), 40 dogs in the rabies challenge studies will be euthanized according to those regulations -- the purpose of conducting those studies is to save the lives and well-being of thousands of dogs.

Every member of The Rabies Challenge Fund regrets that the USDA requires euthanization of the challenge study animals.

Perhaps if you are concerned enough, you will take action at your own cost to change Title 9, Part 113.209, as The Rabies Challenge Fund team has taken action action at our own cost with the hope of extending state-mandated rabies laws from 5 to 7 years.
__________________
Kris L. Christine
Founder, Co-Trustee
THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
Kris L. Christine is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Sponsored Dog Links

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Dog Forum Replies Last Post
Model CANINE VACCINE DISCLOSURE FORM Kris L. Christine Dog Chat 0 02-19-2008 07:16 AM
When is best time to begin a dog's training? a1ire Dog Training 11 04-13-2007 11:28 PM
UF researchers call for dogs to study vaccine treating canine melanoma (Gainesville S admin Latest Breaking Dog News 0 04-12-2007 01:50 PM
Hunting Season to begin today arrrgggg Pupcake Dog Chat 0 09-18-2006 08:30 AM
Dog Agility Equipment: Where Do I Begin? admin Latest Dog Articles From I-Love-Dogs.com 0 08-21-2006 10:33 PM

I-Love-Dogs.com Menu
I-Love-Dogs.com Home I Love Dogs Home
Dog Forums Dogs Forums
Free Dog Stuff! Free Dog Stuff!
Dog Breeds Dog Breeds
Dog Names Dog Names
Dog Games Dog Games
Dog Videos Dog Videos
Dog Pictures Dog Pictures
Dog Supplies Dogs Supplies
Buy Dog Products Dog Products
Dog Articles Dog Articles
Free Dogs Websites Free Dogs Websites
Dog Training Dog Training
Dog Food Dog Food
Dogs For Sale Dogs For Sale
Top 50 Dog Websites Top 50 Dog Websites
Website Award Website Award
Dog Blog Dog News

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 AM.


LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.2.0 © 2008, Crawlability, Inc.


SiteMap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Canine Rabies Vaccine Studies Begin!!